Reivew of Audio Visual Technology
Title: Audio- Visual Technology as a Tool for Teaching Conducting by karen M. Yeisley
Conducting is a very abstract and difficult concept for 4th graders to grasp. At any point there are 26 students to one teacher, this dose not provide much time for the teacher to help out each student.The audience was 26 4th graders at a school in Rockville Maryland in a music class.
There were 4 variables, the first was can the student conduct a song in 3 and / or 4 using a standard conducting pattern. The second variable was can the students demonstrate on task behavior at least 90% of the time. The third variable asked students to evaluate themselves using a likert scale. The fourth variable asked students to evaluate others performances verbally.
The first goal was measured with a rubric provided by the Montgomery County Public Schools. The second goal was evaluated by teacher evaluation, and as previously stated the third goal was measured with a four question likert scale and the fourth variable was evaluated aurally. The final performance was recorded so that students could see what they needed to improve on.
The findings for this study were interesting. The first goal was was succeeded by 77% of students conducting in 3 and 96% of students conducting in 4. The second goal was not achieved because students did not follow rules. as well as some students wanted more time infront of the camera, some did "silly motions" and others got "very nervous". (p. 121) The third goal indicated that students did find reflecting on their own performance helpful. The fourth goal was met but not at a high level, with more time more students could achieve a higher success rate on this goal. It was found that three weeks is not enough for a lesson like this. Small groups may have been more effective.
This study was interesting. I feel that The video camera could have been used differently in this class. When it comes to fourth graders you have to give them some time to be "silly" infront of a camera other wise when you do go to use it for a lesson they will get their silliness out then. I agree that three weeks is not an adequate time frame for a lesson such as this one. I would have spent the time a little differently and allowed at least half a lesson to be dedicated to practice in small groups as well as time to "play" infront of the camera, or get use to being on camera. I may have even brought the camera in a few weeks early and just kept it on in the back of the room so that students could get use to it. I might also do a test performance with the students so that they could take home a copy of their performance on DVD so they could learn from it.
Recording someone so that they can see their own work is a very powerful method of teaching, if someone is suppose to be up infront of people a lot it is worth recording them in a group situation so that they (the person being recorded) can get any nervous jitters, or quirky motions out of themselves.
Out of all the studies this one seems the most straight forward to explain to a colleague. I would explain to them that when they or someone else is performing it is worth while to go back and review the performance, especially if they are going to have to do it again. It is worth seeing where you stumbled and where you excelled.